Week-10 Discussions – Grader Comments

The discussions this week were excellent!  Most of you wrote some really well thought out and meaningful responses to your week 2 discussions.  It was great to read how your opinions have or have not changed towards your intended major, and they were very well written.  

A few students lost points for not including a source from access science, so my advice is to always make sure to read each assignment's grading criteria carefully before you begin each assignment to make sure you will get full credit. 

Week-9 Discussions – Grader Comments

* The majority of discussions this week were excellent.  It seems as though many of you are benefiting from doing your own research and writing a discussion about it.  There were also several comments which linked what you read during research to the senior design presentations you attended.

* Many of you used transitions in your discussions which adds quality to your writing.  Good work!
* Drexel has a superior engineering librarian in Jay Bhatt.  Please keep Jay in mind as you advance through Drexel for all research inquiries. 

* Jay Bhatt
Librarian for Engineering
Hours M-F: 9am-6pm
Hagerty Library, Room 132
bhattjj@drexel.edu
* Please continue to put effort into your labs and discussions as the term comes to a close. 

Week-8 Discussions – Grader Comments

• While each week the discussion grades are improving, I would still recommend putting a little more thought into the "most confusing" and "most interesting" sections.  Make sure to expand upon what you found interesting and confusing in both your primary and secondary source.  This section should be 2-4 paragraphs, as opposed to one sentence each, and is meant to be a thought provoking process.

• Most people have been taking advantage of the preview button BBVista allows and the organization of the articles has much improved, for which I thank you.  Keep up the great work!

Week-7 Discussions – Grader Comments

The discussions this week were excellent. 

• The majority of the class discussed specific examples from their articles and supported them with personal experiences. 
• Furthermore, the majority specifically stated what was most interesting and most confusing in the articles. 
• There is a noticeable improvement in grammar and spelling which dictates professionalism in your writing. 
  
• Lastly, transitions are a great way to keep the readers attention and establish connections to previous statements in your posts.  Please click here to learn more about how transitions can improve your writing.

Please continue the heightened level of effort as you will truly benefit from

Discussion Week-6 Grader’s Comments

• Overall the discussions have improved greatly.  It makes it a lot easier to read them now that people are taking advantage of the preview function and spacing their posts nicely.
• Also, make sure to address the week-specific question in a thoughtful and meaningful manner. 
• Finally, people are making more of an effort to specifically state interesting and confusing aspects of both articles they read.  A few people lost points for incomplete or inadequate interesting or confusing aspects for both articles, but that was a lot less common than in past weeks.  Keep up the great work!

Discussion-5 – AE – Grader Comments

• The most common place for students to lose points was in the "most interesting" or "most confusing" categories.  
• A few posts lacked sufficient length.  Please dedicate more time to your posts and reference your articles more.
• Overall, most discussions were very thorough, organized and informative.  Keep up the good work.

Discussion-3 – Bridges – Grader Comments

• As with the past 2 weeks, the most common place for students to lose points was in the "most interesting" or "most confusing" categories, although substantially less points were lost in this discussion.  
• However, the course information available on VistaBB states that the "most interesting" and "most confusing" sections of the post should be one to two paragraphs.  So expand upon one sentence, which typically cannot sufficiently describe the most interesting aspect of an article.
• Simply listing dimensions of a particular bridge should not be the most interesting part of an article.  While the facts are good to include in your post, talk about something new you learned about the bridge or actually found interesting, in addition to their dimensions.  And again, if nothing was confusing, simply state that.
• I had a comment about how VistaBB won't let you indent, if you want to clean up your post so it's easier to read add an extra return between paragraphs to space them out nicer.  And still take advantage of the "preview" function associated with the discussion posts and make sure to proofread and spellcheck! 

Discussion-2 Grader Comments - Materials

• The term "material" seems to have been loosely interpreted. No points were taken off for choice of material, but for future discussions, it would be wise to select a material typically used in the field you are studying.
• Make sure to post your discussion reply under the thread that most closely relates to the topic of your discussion post.  Many students wrote on the same material and used the same sources, but few referred to the posts of other students. Do not be afraid to change the title of the post to represent the topic of your discussion.
• The most common areas that students lost points was in the "most important" and "most confusing" categories.  As previously said, each student should talk about what they found to be the most important and confusing things about both their primary and secondary articles.  If the article was straightforward and not confusing, simply state that.
• The rest of the comments are minor. 
• Take advantage of the "Preview" function associated with the discussion posts.  This way the post can look exactly as you want it to, in an organized fashion and easy to read. 
• Finally, make sure to proofread your discussion before submitting it.

Discussion Note – Special Topic

A student asked if for Week-4 they should be writing about a specific bridge type or a particular bridge. My response, whose principle will apply in future weeks is:

“If you can find an entry in AccessScience on a specific bridge you are welcome to use that bridge as the subject for your primary and secondary resources. I had imagined that you would look first at the general topic of bridges and then find a specific one with your secondary resource, but that’s not required.”

Jim Mitchell

Discussion-1 – Grader Comments

Here are the comments the grader made on the first discussion.

• From what I found, most students took the assignment seriously.  There were some really great posts about why they chose the major they chose.  And when people talked about the journal articles and what they found interesting and confusing their responses were serious and appropriate.  From what I could tell people found the readings worthwhile and really related it back to why they chose their major, and things they hadn't thought about in regards to their major. 
• The most common areas that students lost points was in the "most important" and "most confusing" categories.  I'd like to reiterate that each student should talk about what they found to be the most important and confusing things about both their primary and secondary articles.  If the article was straightforward and not confusing, simply state that. 
• The rest of my comments are minor.  Make sure to post your discussion reply under the thread that most closely relates to your major.  Also, take advantage of the "Preview" function associated with the discussion posts.  This way the post can look exactly as you want it to, in an organized fashion.  Finally, make sure to proofread your discussion before submitting it.

Clarifying the Discussion Requirements

The goal of the discussions is to have you look at the professional literature and also at your fellow student’s work. 

Primary Source

The requirement that everyone in a group read the “Primary Source” (at least using AccessScience as the starting point) is to ensure that there is a common ground.

Secondary Source

The secondary source may be any of those that you’re led to from the library’s reference page.  I would hope that it will in some way amplify or contradict or otherwise supplement what you have read in the primary source, but we won’t enforce that strictly, at least not initially till we see how the discussions develop in the first few weeks.  I’d certainly encourage you to link the two in what you write.

Jim Mitchell